‘Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value’.
Albert Einstein
The purpose of a charity is to make itself redundant, unnecessary. An outrageous statement from the founder of a brand new charity, perhaps, but one in which I fervently believe.
The Charities Commission is quite clear on the purposes of a charity, taken in conjunction with the Charities Act 2011:
- The prevention or relief of poverty
- The advancement of education
- The advancement of religion
- The advancement of health or the saving of lives
- The advancement of citizenship or community development
- The advancement of the arts, culture, heritage or science
- The advancement of amateur sport
- The advancement of human rights, conflict resolution or reconciliation or the promotion of religious or racial harmony or equality and diversity
- The advancement of environmental protection or improvement
- The relief of those in need, by reason of youth, age, ill-health, disability, financial hardship or other disadvantage
- The advancement of animal welfare
- The promotion of the efficiency of the armed forces of the Crown, or of the efficiency of the police, fire and rescue services or ambulance services
- Any other purposes currently recognised as charitable and any new charitable purposes which are similar to another charitable purpose
The box that Suffice ticks is “the relief of those in need, by reason of youth, age, ill-health, disability, financial hardship or other disadvantage”, one of the newer purposes expanded from the earlier 2006 Act. We would previously have ticked “relief of poverty” but the new purposes are better defined and hopefully remove any woolliness in charitable aims.
The history of charity and philanthropy is fascinating, and there is wry amusement to be found in the existence of charities for “really distressed foreigners”. Evidently, these were necessary at the time they were formed. We should be happy that we no longer require Foundling Hospitals for illegitimate babies (although anything is possible in today’s reactionary society) – but it doesn’t mean that the need for support for young inexperienced mothers before and after the birth is no longer vital.
Then there are the charities that start out with a very real focus and need, and do great work for a number of years. The socio-political climate changes, and they find that their purpose has now become the focus of government policy. Great! Isn’t that how Lord Shaftesbury achieved factory reforms and stopped boys going up chimneys? Times have changed, though, and the government’s focus on welfare reform and targeting those distant from the job market now means that charities compete to win contracts from the JobCentrePlus and are the ones who must apply sanctions to beneficiaries who fail to meet the exacting conditions of the Work Programme. I heard just this weekend of someone who was constantly penalised because he had not logged in his job-seeking activity when, in fact, he could not use a computer to do so. I expect rules are bent and allowances made, but how awful to find yourself in a position as a charity where you add to the distress of your beneficiaries! Maybe Suffice will not hold those big public sector contracts, maybe our poor trustees will strain their eyes ploughing through the small print to make sure we never find ourselves in that situation, but I promise you this: Suffice will never operate any project or programme that leaves any of our clients wishing that they had never heard of us.
So, back to my earlier point – our aim is therefore to obviate the need experienced by people at disadvantage. This is a pretty sweeping statement, encompassing definitions of want and adequate means, the thorny issues of equality and positive action, and much more. I will be addressing some of these subjects in later blog posts. For now, suffice it to say (every pun intended), that Suffice will endeavour to make mediation and intervention, firefighting and advocacy the role of everybody. Everybody. Disadvantage through poor education, health issues, hidden disabilities or lack of support should and will become as heinous as child labour and Sunday visits to laugh at the madhouse inmates.